[cxx-abi-dev] RE: [cxx-abi] [cxx-abi-dev] Mangling unary plus

[Mark Mitchell]

--On Thursday, October 10, 2002 03:49:59 PM -0700 Dennis Handly 
<dhandly at cup.hp.com> wrote:

>> How is this better than my proposal?
>
> Probability games.  We have real paying customers that will be upset of
> anything is changed.  I don't think many users have unary + in template
> function arguments but they may have operator unary plus.

We already know that aCC doesn't match the ABI spec in much more serious
ways than this.

G++ is in this boat too; there's now a switch to say whether you want
the first try at the ABI, or a more correct version.

If we start trying to make these half-way changes, we're going to make
an already too-complex ABI even more complex.

How do we reach consensus?

-- 
Mark Mitchell                mark at codesourcery.com
CodeSourcery, LLC            http://www.codesourcery.com