[cxx-abi-dev] RE: [cxx-abi] [cxx-abi-dev] Mangling unary plus

[Dennis Handly]

>How is this better than my proposal?

Probability games.  We have real paying customers that will be upset of
anything is changed.  I don't think many users have unary + in template
function arguments but they may have operator unary plus.

>Your suggestion also introduces an unnecessary wart in the ABI; there
>are enough complications as it stands.
Mark Mitchell

True, but you can't change ABIs in midstream, mine is a compromise.