[cxx-abi-dev] C++0x POD

[Jason Merrill]

On 07/17/2009 01:49 PM, Lawrence Crowl wrote:
> On 7/16/09, Gabriel Dos Reis<gdr at integrable-solutions.net>  wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 4:22 PM, Dennis Handly<dhandly at cup.hp.com>  wrote:
>>> From: Jason Merrill<jason at redhat.com>
>>>> Yes, because complex<>  has trivial copy constructor and destructor
>>>> (libstdc++ leaves out the copy constructor mentioned in the standard).

> Hm.  Isn't that constructor constexpr or =default now?

It doesn't seem to have any specification other than the declaration in 
the summary of the general template.  The specializations don't have a 
declaration.

Jason