[cxx-abi-dev] C++0x POD

[Lawrence Crowl]

On 7/16/09, Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr at integrable-solutions.net> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 4:22 PM, Dennis Handly<dhandly at cup.hp.com> wrote:
> > From: Jason Merrill <jason at redhat.com>
> > > Yes, because complex<> has trivial copy constructor and destructor
> > > (libstdc++ leaves out the copy constructor mentioned in the standard).
> >
> > Any reason the Standard isn't fixed to remove this unneeded baggage?
>
> I tried, but failed.

Hm.  Isn't that constructor constexpr or =default now?

> > (Or at least make it implementation defined?)

-- 
Lawrence Crowl