Array constructor/destructor update

[Jason Merrill]

>>>>> Jim Dehnert <dehnert at baalbek.engr.sgi.com> writes:

 > Jason Merrill wrote:
 >> 
 >> I think __cxa_vec_destructor should take a number of elements, and not the
 >> padding size, so that it can be used for destroying non-heap arrays.

 > Fine with me.  It does mean that the cookie load has to happen at the
 > caller.  Anyone have any objections?

That seems parallel to the _ctor case.

Jason