Array constructor/destructor update

[Jim Dehnert]

Jason Merrill wrote:
> 
> I think __cxa_vec_destructor should take a number of elements, and not the
> padding size, so that it can be used for destroying non-heap arrays.

Fine with me.  It does mean that the cookie load has to happen at the caller.
Anyone have any objections?

> How about "ctor" and "dtor"?

Sure.  I'll change it.

Jim

PS:  Our network has been horrible from midday Friday until mid-Sunday.
Although I don't know that I missed any mail (and I did get mail during
the period), if you didn't get a response from me that you expected,
please resend.  (That probably applies to the other SGI people, too.)

-	    Jim Dehnert		dehnert at sgi.com
				(650)933-4272