[cxx-abi-dev] Operator co_await

[David Vandevoorde]

> On Feb 11, 2016, at 2:06 PM, Richard Smith <richardsmith at googlers.com> wrote:
> 
> On 11 February 2016 at 07:43, David Vandevoorde <daveed at edg.com <mailto:daveed at edg.com>> wrote:
> A proposal for coroutine support is making its way through the C++ committee.  Here is the latest public document:
> 
>         http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2015/p0057r1.pdf <http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2015/p0057r1.pdf>
> 
> It includes a new “operator co_await” that will require mangling when supported.
> 
> How about reserving the operator code “aw” for it?
> 
> I.e., once standardized or TS'd, we’d add a production to <operator-name>:
> 
>         <operator-name> ::= nw         # new
>                         ...
>                         ::= aw         # co_await (unary)
>                         ...
> 
> I agree, see http://sourcerytools.com/pipermail/cxx-abi-dev/2015-October/002868.html <http://sourcerytools.com/pipermail/cxx-abi-dev/2015-October/002868.html> =) 


Ha! I apparently filed that away without reading it :-P  Sorry.

	Daveed

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://sourcerytools.com/pipermail/cxx-abi-dev/attachments/20160211/20afe097/attachment-0001.html>