[cxx-abi-dev] Uncallable constructor variants
    Jason Merrill 
    jason at redhat.com
       
    Fri Apr  1 14:36:05 UTC 2016
    
    
  
On 04/01/2016 10:33 AM, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
> On 04/01/16 10:15, Jason Merrill wrote:
>> The base object constructor can never be called for a final class, nor can the
>> complete object constructor for an abstract one.  Does anyone see an ABI problem
>> with omitting these variants?
>
> Presumably the same applies to the corresponding destructors? (With any
> deleting-dtor behaving the same as the complete-dtor)
Yes, except that virtual complete/deleting destructors always need to be 
emitted, to satisfy vtable references.
Jason
    
    
More information about the cxx-abi-dev
mailing list