[cxx-abi-dev] Transfer modes for parameters and return values

[Jason Merrill]

On 05/07/2014 03:11 AM, Richard Smith wrote:
> I think it would be *extremely* surprising if we implicitly added a call
> to a function that is deleted or inaccessible, that the original code
> didn't call.   What alternative do you suggest?

It seems to me that for a trivially copyable class, copying doesn't need 
to be modeled as a call at all.

Jason