[cxx-abi-dev] Proposal: missing mangling of elaborated type specifiers

John McCall rjmccall at apple.com
Mon Apr 28 06:13:38 UTC 2014


On Mar 26, 2014, at 2:36 PM, John McCall <rjmccall at apple.com> wrote:
> On Mar 26, 2014, at 2:32 PM, Richard Smith <richardsmith at google.com> wrote:
>> On 26 March 2014 13:59, John McCall <rjmccall at apple.com> wrote:
>> On Mar 26, 2014, at 1:46 PM, Hubert Tong <hstong at ca.ibm.com> wrote:
>> > John McCall <rjmccall at apple.com> wrote on 26-03-2014 03:54:40 PM:
>> > > From: John McCall <rjmccall at apple.com>
>> > > To: Richard Smith <richardsmith at google.com>,
>> > > Cc: Hubert Tong/Toronto/IBM at IBMCA, "cxx-abi-dev at codesourcery.com"
>> > > <cxx-abi-dev at codesourcery.com>
>> > > Date: 26-03-2014 03:54 PM
>> > > Subject: Re: [cxx-abi-dev] Missing mangling of elaborated type specifiers
>> > >
>> > > On Mar 26, 2014, at 12:23 PM, Richard Smith <richardsmith at google.com> wrote:
>> > > On 26 March 2014 11:59, John McCall <rjmccall at apple.com> wrote:
>> > > I agree that the benefit of a demangler being able to say whether
>> > > it's got a class or struct is marginal. Maybe drop the 'TC' mangling
>> > > and keep the other three?
>> > >
>> > > Sounds good to me.
>> > Agreed. The proposal I had in the works was substantially similar (option 2 with no class/struct distinction).
>> > I think we can move forward with the proposal presented by Richard.
>> 
>> Okay, so this is the proposal under review:
>> 
>> <class-enum-type> ::= <name>    # non-dependent or dependent type name or dependent elaborated type specifier using ‘typename'
>> 
>> Nit: This last case is a typename-specifier, not an elaborated-type-specifier.
> 
> I will make that change.
> 
>> Do we need to clarify that we mean 'instantiation-dependent' by 'dependent' here?
> 
> No, I think that’s the standard rule for dependence in the mangling section.

Okay, I’ve applied and pushed these changes.  Thanks!

John.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://sourcerytools.com/pipermail/cxx-abi-dev/attachments/20140427/cceb29d1/attachment.html>


More information about the cxx-abi-dev mailing list