[cxx-abi-dev] A mangling for std::nullptr_t

Lawrence Crowl crowl at google.com
Tue Sep 22 22:37:25 UTC 2009


On 9/21/09, Jason Merrill <jason at redhat.com> wrote:
> On 09/18/2009 09:58 PM, Dennis Handly wrote:
> > > From: David Vandevoorde<daveed at edg.com>
> > > decltype(nullptr) maybe, or std::nullptr_t
> > > (although the latter is typedef).
> >
> > Yes, that's why I didn't suggest the latter.
>
> That doesn't really seem like a problem to me.  The Dn mangling
> sounds good.

Personally, I'd go with the decltype.  Following the standard can
rarely be wrong, even if it is ... odd.

-- 
Lawrence Crowl



More information about the cxx-abi-dev mailing list