[cxx-abi-dev] Non-cloned [cd]tors

[Jason Merrill]

On 11/18/2009 09:15 PM, Dennis Handly wrote:
>> From: Jason Merrill<jason at redhat.com>
>> As I recall, the ABI was intended to allow the various [cd]tor variants
>> to be implemented either as separate functions or multiple entry points
>> to the same function. ...
>> each in their own COMDAT group.
>
> We have implemented it both ways, now with separate functions.  But we only
> have one group for all of them.

What is the name of that group?  That seems like something the ABI ought 
to specify.

>>from a language perspective there's only one constructor anyway.
>
> Unless they know the mangling rules.

Right, but the mangling rules aren't part of the language.

Jason