[cxx-abi-dev] Deleted virtual functions

[Dennis Handly]

>From: Lawrence Crowl <crowl at google.com>
>I have been keeping an eye on the issues, and trying to avoid
>making matters worse.  However, there are no good solutions without
>language support.  In particular, the language needs to recognize
>a layer of scoping between the translation unit and the program.

Yes, that was part of it.

>I think we did our users a disservice by abandoning the work.

Don't blame me.  ;-)
I was saying we could do most of it but we would have to work harder
in the runtime.

>> Future directions in the standard should be thought out for the ABI.

>I don't follow this comment.  Can you clarify your intent?
Lawrence Crowl

The issues that Sean and Mark brought up, whether the type_infos (and
dynamic_casts) are the same or not.  Based on their visibility to a
dynamic loader.

I don't know if the questions we raised were in your URL?
http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/papers/2007/n2425.html