[cxx-abi-dev] C++0x POD

[Gabriel Dos Reis]

On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 4:22 PM, Dennis Handly<dhandly at cup.hp.com> wrote:
>>From: Jason Merrill <jason at redhat.com>
>>Yes, because complex<> has trivial copy constructor and destructor
>>(libstdc++ leaves out the copy constructor mentioned in the standard).
>
> Any reason the Standard isn't fixed to remove this unneeded baggage?

I tried, but failed.

> (Or at least make it implementation defined?)
>