[cxx-abi-dev] RE: [cxx-abi] [cxx-abi-dev] Mangling unary plus

[Mark Mitchell]

--On Thursday, October 10, 2002 11:54:50 PM -0700 Dennis Handly 
<dhandly at cup.hp.com> wrote:

>> We already know that aCC doesn't match the ABI spec in much more serious
>> ways than this.
>> How do we reach consensus?
> Mark Mitchell                mark at codesourcery.com
>
> I guess if you have those g++ flags, and since aC++ is already different,
> the right way is to add that "ps" for unary +.

Good.  I'm going to take that as consensus, since nobody else has
objected.  (Intel originally moved for "pl", but has not objected since
I pointed out that was actually ambiguous.)

Here is the patch I've checked in.

-- 
Mark Mitchell                mark at codesourcery.com
CodeSourcery, LLC            http://www.codesourcery.com

Index: abi.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /usr/local/Repository/cxx-abi/abi.html,v
retrieving revision 1.34
diff -c -5 -p -r1.34 abi.html
*** abi.html	9 Oct 2002 02:24:30 -0000	1.34
--- abi.html	11 Oct 2002 18:59:54 -0000
*************** the first of which is lowercase.
*** 3908,3917 ****
--- 3908,3918 ----
  <pre><font color=blue><code>
    <operator-name> ::= nw	# new
  		  ::= na	# new[]
  		  ::= dl	# delete
  		  ::= da	# delete[]
+ 		  ::= ps        # + (unary)
  		  ::= ng	# - (unary)
  		  ::= ad	# & (unary)
  		  ::= de	# * (unary)
  		  ::= co	# ~
  		  ::= pl	# +
*************** unwind table location.
*** 4870,4879 ****
--- 4871,4884 ----

  <p> <hr> <p>
  <a name=revisions>
  <h2> Appendix R: Revision History </h2>
  <p> <hr> <p>
+
+ <p>
+ <font color=blue>[021011]</font>
+ Add mangling for unary plus.

  <p>
  <font color=blue>[021008]</font>
  Make the names used for constructors and destructor entry points
  consistent throughout.