[cxx-abi] [cxx-abi-dev] Mangling unary plus

[Nelson, Clark]

> For this example:
> 
>   struct A { void operator+(); };
> 
> what is the mangling of A::operator+?
> 
> The current ABI spec says that "unary and binary operators using the
> same symbol have different encodings" -- but does not actually specify
> a mangling for unary plus, even though it does specify manglings for
> unary minus, unary *, and unary &.
> 
> G++ uses "ps" for unary plus.
> 
> Intel, HP -- what do your compilers do?

Intel's compiler uses "pl".

> If there are no objections, I will update the document to 
> indicate that
> "ps" is the approved spelling in a few days.

Hmmm. I guess we need a tie-breaker.

--
Clark Nelson
Intel Corporation
clark.nelson at intel.com