Mangling unary plus

[Mark Mitchell]

For this example:

  struct A { void operator+(); };

what is the mangling of A::operator+?

The current ABI spec says that "unary and binary operators using the
same symbol have different encodings" -- but does not actually specify
a mangling for unary plus, even though it does specify manglings for
unary minus, unary *, and unary &.

G++ uses "ps" for unary plus.

Intel, HP -- what do your compilers do?

If there are no objections, I will update the document to indicate that
"ps" is the approved spelling in a few days.

-- 
Mark Mitchell                mark at codesourcery.com
CodeSourcery, LLC            http://www.codesourcery.com