[cxx-abi-dev] Question about tail padding

[Jason Merrill]

On Fri, 16 Aug 2002 12:00:54 +0100, scott douglass <sdouglass at arm.com> wrote:

> If the tail padding must not be changed this will be quite inefficient
> when there is a trailing bit-field -- it makes you wish there were
> separate whole-object op= and a sub-object op=.

dsize for a class is measured in bytes, so bit-fields shouldn't make a
difference.

Jason