Emptyness vs. virtualness

[Mark Mitchell]

>>>>> "Jim" == Jim Dehnert <dehnert at transmeta.com> writes:

    Jim> Well, I think it's well-defined now, and can be clarified if
    Jim> necessary.  Further, I think the alternative will be a
    Jim> messier rule.  So would it be beneficial enough to be worth
    Jim> changing it?

I'm sorry; I'm not sure I understand what you think is the status
quo.  That only non-virtual parts are considered for overlap, or that
virtual parts are?

--
Mark Mitchell                   mark at codesourcery.com
CodeSourcery, LLC               http://www.codesourcery.com