local names

Jason Merrill jason at redhat.com
Fri Sep 1 05:05:54 UTC 2000


>>>>> Alex Samuel <samuel at codesourcery.com> writes:

 > The innermost <component> is `1D', the next is `1C', and the outermost
 > one is a <local-name> for foo, I think.  This is clearly not
 > necessary, since the we've already encoded foo up front.  

Why not just put the foo inside the nested-name, rather than using the
local-name production for local types?

Jason




More information about the cxx-abi-dev mailing list