Subobject constructors

[Jim Dehnert]

> From: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery.com>
> 
> The wording in 3.3 about subobject constructors is misleading:
> 
>   If the not-in-charge constructor calls constructors for base class
>   subobjects that do not need construction vtables, the construction
>   vtable parameter is not passed to the base class subobject
>   constructor, and the base class subobject constructors use their
>   complete object vtables for initialization.
> 
> This is also true when an in-charge constructor is making the call.
> There is never a need to pass a VTT to a base class subobject that
> doesn't have virtual bases.

See if it looks better now...

Jim

-	    Jim Dehnert		dehnert at sgi.com
				(650)933-4272