COM compatibility

[Christophe de Dinechin]

> A while ago Jason was worried about COM compatibility.
> Part of that is to ensure that vtables can be expressed in C.
> But the resolution of issue B-4 says that a vtable contains
> function descriptors rather than function descriptor pointers.

Did we resolve that issue that way? I was quite convinced we had  
finally decided for "every pointer is a C-style pointer" precisely  
because of this kind of problems. Mmmh, I'd better check today with  
the rest of the team. Are there other cases where we have a function  
pointer that is not a C-style function pointer?


Christophe