[cxx-abi-dev] Non-trivial move constructor

Jason Merrill jason at redhat.com
Wed Feb 24 21:12:11 UTC 2016


On 02/24/2016 03:56 PM, John McCall wrote:
> I agree with your proposal in theory, but I’m concerned about changing
> the ABI at this point.  We *are* talking about the language standard that was
> released six years ago, and an area of that standard that was theoretically
> fully implemented by compilers several years before that.

Agreed.

Jason



More information about the cxx-abi-dev mailing list