[cxx-abi-dev] Operator co_await

[Richard Smith]

We should also specify a representation for coroutine_handle<>.

On 11 February 2016 at 11:06, Richard Smith <richardsmith at googlers.com>
wrote:

> On 11 February 2016 at 07:43, David Vandevoorde <daveed at edg.com> wrote:
>
>> A proposal for coroutine support is making its way through the C++
>> committee.  Here is the latest public document:
>>
>>
>> http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2015/p0057r1.pdf
>>
>> It includes a new “operator co_await” that will require mangling when
>> supported.
>>
>> How about reserving the operator code “aw” for it?
>>
>> I.e., once standardized or TS'd, we’d add a production to <operator-name>:
>>
>>         <operator-name> ::= nw         # new
>>                         ...
>>                         ::= aw         # co_await (unary)
>>                         ...
>
>
> I agree, see
> http://sourcerytools.com/pipermail/cxx-abi-dev/2015-October/002868.html
> =)
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://sourcerytools.com/pipermail/cxx-abi-dev/attachments/20160211/73cefc97/attachment.html>