[cxx-abi-dev] Volatile nonstatic data members

[David Vandevoorde]

> On Mar 6, 2015, at 4:49 PM, David Vandevoorde <daveed at edg.com> wrote:
> 
> 
>> On Mar 6, 2015, at 4:32 PM, Richard Smith <richardsmith at googlers.com <mailto:richardsmith at googlers.com>> wrote:
[…]
>> 
>> I see three ways out: extend 1590 to also include this "volatile members don't count" clause, or allow a constructor to make an additional copy of a parameter object in all cases of copy-initialization, or revert the resolution of 496.
>> 
>> Reverting 496 seems most palatable to me right now, but in any case this seems like something for CWG to decide rather than something for us to work around in the ABI.
> 
> 
> Agreed.

I've asked Mike Miller (CWG chair) to open an issue about that.

	Daveed


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://sourcerytools.com/pipermail/cxx-abi-dev/attachments/20150306/d7ff0e8f/attachment.html>