[cxx-abi-dev] mangling template-id

[Jason Merrill]

On 12/22/2009 12:20 AM, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On 12/17/2009 07:09 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
>> On 12/17/2009 05:58 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
>>>> Handling this just as unqualified-name template-args seems to work
>>>> fine;
>>>> any reason not to just add that to expression? We also need to
>>>> support a
>>>> plain identifier for overloaded functions.
>>
>> Hmm...where this runs into trouble is with operator names. Where t is a
>> function parameter, operator+(t,t) would mangle as clplfp_fp_E, which is
>> ambiguous; it could also mean (t+t)().
>>
>> So I guess we need something to distinguish an operator name used as a
>> function name from an operator name used as an operator.
>
> New patch adds "on" (operator name) before an operator name used as an
> unqualified name. It isn't necessary in . and -> expressions, since we
> already know that the second operand is a name.

Any comments before I put this mangling into GCC 4.5?

Jason