[cxx-abi-dev] mangling template-id

[Jason Merrill]

On 12/17/2009 07:09 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On 12/17/2009 05:58 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
>>> Handling this just as unqualified-name template-args seems to work fine;
>>> any reason not to just add that to expression? We also need to support a
>>> plain identifier for overloaded functions.
>
> Hmm...where this runs into trouble is with operator names. Where t is a
> function parameter, operator+(t,t) would mangle as clplfp_fp_E, which is
> ambiguous; it could also mean (t+t)().
>
> So I guess we need something to distinguish an operator name used as a
> function name from an operator name used as an operator.

New patch adds "on" (operator name) before an operator name used as an 
unqualified name.  It isn't necessary in . and -> expressions, since we 
already know that the second operand is a name.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: abi-dependent-name.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 2628 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://sourcerytools.com/pipermail/cxx-abi-dev/attachments/20091222/ee08a88a/attachment.bin>