On Mar 25, 2008, at 11:25 AM, Doug Gregor wrote: > We don't have a mangling for the C++0x char16_t or char32_t types. It > has been suggested that we use 'k' for char16_t and 'q' for char32_t. > Does that seem reasonable? Fine by me, although I'd prefer something a little more "mnemonical"; maybe W2 and W4. Daveed