[cxx-abi-dev] Nearly empty classes

[Jim Dehnert]

Mark Mitchell wrote:
> 
> I believe the correct fix is to to rephrase the first line of the
> definition of nearly empty class as:
> 
>   A dynamic class that contains no data except its virtual pointer or
>   virtual bases.  In particular, it:
> 
> Any objections?

That is, you mean to require that a nearly empty class has a virtual
pointer?  If so, you should say so more explicitly.  But my gut feeling
is that it makes more sense to add the condition to the primary base
choice, since that's what it comes from.

Jim


-- 
-	    Jim Dehnert		dehnert at transmeta.com
	    (408)919-6984	dehnertj at acm.org