Terminology

[Ron 603-884-2088]

>I agree that being at variance with a Standard definition is bad,
>but I'm not too fond of "vptr-containing".  Anyone have a better
>suggestion?  Better, I think, but still not ideal, might be
>pseudo-polymorphic...

How does super-polymorphic grab ya, since the ABI notion is a superset of
the language term? It sounds a bit grandios, but perhaps captures the right
concept...

Ron