`abi' namespace

[Matt Austern]

I think that's irrelevant.  We're not putting any of this in standard
headers.

If we're willing to put __ in our symbol names, we don't really need
a namespace of our own.

			--Matt


On Feb 16,  9:51am, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
> Subject: `abi' namespace
> Hi,
> `abi' is not in the implementation namespace. we should be using
> `__abi' or `std::abi' or something.
>
> [17.4.3.1] and [17.4.3.1.2] are relevant here, but other than symbols
> inside `std', doesn't talk about implementation reserved namespaces, only
> global symbols -- perhaps this is a defect. Anyway, I think the intent
> is clear.
>
> nathan
> --
> Dr Nathan Sidwell :: Computer Science Department :: Bristol University
> Never hand someone a gun unless you are sure where they will point it
> nathan at acm.org  http://www.cs.bris.ac.uk/~nathan/  nathan at cs.bris.ac.uk
>-- End of excerpt from Nathan Sidwell