mangling enum literals

[Jim Dehnert]

This is what we decided to do today, along with the name of the enumerated
type.

Jim

Daveed Vandevoorde wrote:
> 
> Alex Samuel wrote:
> >
> > The paragraph discussing literal template arguments doesn't mention
> > enumeral values.  Do we use the value's <source-name>, or numerical
> > representation in the underlying type?
> 
> I think you need to use the numerical value, because some valid enum
> values may not have a name.