Empty base optimization, sharing vptrs
Christophe de Dinechin
ddd at cup.hp.com
Thu Jun 17 16:37:23 UTC 1999
From: "Matt Austern" <austern at isolde.engr.sgi.com>
> My take on the discussion is that everyone agrees there is a defect in
> the standard, because it can reasonably be interpreted both ways,
and that
> the standard needs to be clarified. Several people expressed
support for
> the interpretation under which this proposed layout rule is legal. My
> guess (perhaps Mike and Jason could comment, since they've both
seen the
> discussion too) is that's how this issue will eventually be resolve.
Even though I don't read the standard that way today, I still would
favor this resolution, because it just seems to make sense.
Thank you for forwarding the messages, I will investigate why I
don't receive them.
Christophe
More information about the cxx-abi-dev
mailing list